- Sport Sciences - Apr 17 Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games: the science of sprinting
- Medicine - Apr 17 Statement from U of M president following New York Times story
- Medicine - Apr 17 New developments in Midwestern canine influenza outbreak
- Medicine - Apr 17 Chancellor Michael Wilson named chair of Mental Health Commission of Canada
- Environmental Sciences - Apr 17 Fast access to CryoSat’s Arctic ice measurements now available
- Event - Apr 17 Children with disabilities can make competent witnesses
- Psychology - Apr 17 Leaders who can read the crowd do better
- Social Sciences - Apr 17 Victorian youth re-offending rates significantly lower than today
- Medicine - Apr 17 Cognitive problems are common after cardiac arrest
- Social Sciences - Apr 17 Manifesto Check: Conservatives talk tough but bring nothing new on immigration
- Arts - Apr 17 Thumbnail track pad
- Medicine - Apr 16 Sandoz receives FDA approval for GlatopaTM as the first generic competitor to MS therapy Copaxone 20mg
- Social Sciences - Apr 16 Manifesto Check: on immigration, UKIP offers only confusion
- Chemistry - Apr 16 Scientists collaborate on project to make next generation industrial filters
- Medicine - Apr 16 Victorian baby teeth could help predict future health of children today
- Astronomy - Apr 16 GOCE helps tap into sustainable energy resources
Cost of regulations and subsidies reduce effectiveness of carbon pricing
Subsidies and regulations could seriously reduce the effectiveness of Australia’s forthcoming carbon price scheme, according to a piece in the latest Australian Economic Review.
In ’Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions at the Lowest Cost’, the University of Melbourne’s Professor John Freebairn said a carbon price was a low-cost way of reducing pollution, but that non-carbon-pricing components such as household subsidies could defeat the purpose of a carbon price.
"Businesses and households are given the incentives and rewards to explore over time new information and opportunities to cost-effectively reduce pollution," said Professor Freebairn.
Professor Peter Lloyd from the University of Melbourne discusses this further in his piece ’Designing a carbon price policy’, where he explains that while compensating households is extremely generous, it increases the cost of a carbon pricing mechanism and is unnecessary.
"It is sometimes suggested that providing households with assistance would cancel the benefits of introducing a carbon price. It is said that, if we impose a carbon price that costs a household $100 and then provide that household with a tax cut worth $100 nothing has changed. These suggestions are wrong. The carbon price even with the tax cut alters the relative prices of more or less emission-intensive goods and services," said Professor Lloyd
Edited by Professor Ross Williams AM from the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, the Australian Economic Review (AER) is the peak economic policy review journal in the country. This edition tackles some of the key issues with the carbon tax ahead of its take-up on 1 July, and includes discussions on carbon pricing, the negative impact of subsidies and market-based mechanisms in general.
Also featured is the annual roundup of the economy over the past year, with the Melbourne Institute’s Professor Guay Lim arguing that the biggest risk comes from the eventual decline in commodity prices, adding "it would not be too early to plan for the day when commodity prices fall, as it could be detrimental for the manufacturing industry".
Henry Ergas from the University of Wollongong also looked at the effectiveness of a carbon price policy and concluded that Australia should focus on adapting to climate change, arguing that market based mechanisms would be harmful to the Australian economy.
And in an article on school choice, Astghik Mavisakalyan from the Australian National University looked at private versus public school choices of natives and immigrants, and found private school attendance among Australian born students to be higher in areas with high immigrant populations.
The March edition is available from: www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/aere
Last job offers
- Pedagogy/Education Science - 17.4
- Social Sciences - 17.4
Wissensch. Mitarbeiter/in (80 %) Übergänge Schule – Beruf – Selbständige Lebensführung
- Medicine/Pharmacology - 15.4
Wissensch. Mitarbeiter/in Naturwissenschaftsdidaktik (40−50 %)
- Business/Economics - 13.4
EPFL / Schweizerische Post: Doktorandenstelle zum Thema “Bargeldentwicklung 202X”
- Architecture - 9.4
Professeur-e HES - Responsable de son Département Architecture d’intérieur
- Mathematics - 7.4
Dozent/in (60–80 %) Fachwissenschaft Mathematik
- Event - 17.4
Professor II/førsteamanuensis 20% i medisin (helsefag) knyttet til hovedstilling ved Regionsenter for...
- Administration/Government - 17.4
Professor/førsteamanuensis i skatterett
- Chemistry - 17.4
Professur für Chemische Verfahrenstechnik
- Business/Economics - 15.4
Universitätsassistentin mit Doktorat für Professoren-Laufbahnstelle
- Mechanical Engineering - 17.4
- Media Sciences - 17.4
Professur für Europäische Politik
- Medicine/Pharmacology - 17.4
Lecturer (Grade 8) or Associate Professor (Grade 9) in decision-analytic modelling for economic evaluations...
- Media Sciences - 17.4
Chair in Political Science / International Studies- 31505
- Life Sciences - 18.4
Faculty Position in Surgical Pathology
- Life Sciences - 17.4
Assistant / Associate Professor of Genetics and Complex Diseases