Our decisions to trust people with our money are based more on how they look then how they behave, according to new research from the University of Warwick.
- Chemistry - 13:00 Coated droplets hint at formation of early cells
- Earth Sciences - 12:01 UCL and HR Wallingford collaborate to construct Europe’s largest tsunami simulator
- Environmental Sciences - 11:00 Exploring the life and legacies of an untimely prophet
- Earth Sciences - 11:00 Mega- heatwaves dissected
- History - 09:00 New book lays Gallipoli legend to rest
- Business - 08:00 Novartis delivered solid sales and profit growth in the first quarter of 2014
- Physics - Apr 24 Probing the sound of a quantum dot
- Environmental Sciences - Apr 23 Invasive vines swallow up New York's natural areas
- Environmental Sciences - Apr 23 Expert cautions: 'Nature never forgets nor forgives'
- Chemistry - Apr 23 Wearable technologies flourish as functional fashion
- Medicine - Apr 23 UHealth: Leader in Breakthrough Technology
- Agronomy - Apr 23 New dean to lead Faculty of ALES into its second century April 23, 2014 Stanford Blade, CEO of ...
- Medicine - Apr 23 A holistic approach to targeting cancer
- Arts - Apr 23 An 18th century lesson for the budding musicians of today
- Medicine - Apr 23 Manchester Psoriasis Shout Out raising awareness of the skin condition psoriasis
- Medicine - Apr 23 Fundraisers go behind the scenes at University cancer research labs
Looks matter more than reputation when it comes to trusting people with our money
In a paper recently published in the PLoS One journal, researchers from Warwick Business School, the University College London and Dartmouth College, USA, carried out a series of experiments to see if people made decisions to trust others based on their faces.
They found people are more likely to invest money in someone whose face is generally perceived as trustworthy, even when they are given negative information about this person’s reputation.
The team used a computer algorithm to create a set of 20 pairs of faces at opposing ends of the trustworthiness scale. This computer software modifies the apparent trustworthiness of faces by altering their features. The researchers were able to experimentally manipulate the unfakeable features (those related to shape of the face) that make a face look trustworthy or untrustworthy. These 40 faces were then used in a series of trust games with human participants.
Each volunteer was given a sum of money and told they could invest any part of the amount in a trustee whose face appeared on the screen. Any amount they invested would be tripled and volunteers were told it was then up the trustee to decide how much to send back to them. Thus participants had an incentive to invest only in trustees who could be expected to return more than the invested amount.
The researchers found that 13 out of 15 participants invested more, on average, in the trustworthy identities. In a second experiment, the researchers gave the volunteers information about whether the trustees had good or bad histories. Even with this inside information, the average amount invested in those who looked ‘trustworthy’ was 6% higher.
Chris Olivola from the University of Warwick’s Warwick Business School said: “Trustees with good and bad histories benefitted equally from trustworthy-looking facial features. The temptation to judge strangers by their faces is hard to resist. Trustworthiness is one of the most important traits for social and economic interactions and our study examines whether people take potentially costly actions in line with their face-based trustworthiness judgments.
“It seems we are still willing to go with our own instincts about whether we think someone looks like we can trust them.”
Last job offers
- Life Sciences - 24.4
Post-Doctoral Position in Protein Engineering
- Social Sciences - 23.4
Dozentin / Dozent mit Unterrichts- und Forschungstätigkeit
- Computer Science - 23.4
Wissensch. Mitarbeiter/in (70 %) Neue Bildungsinhalte im Bereich Informatik
- Media Sciences - 23.4
Wissensch. Mitarbeiter/in (60 %) Kommunikation und Organisation neuer Bildungsinhalte im Bereich Informatik...
- Literature - 22.4
Doktorand/in Französische Linguistik Schwerpunkt Angewandte Linguistik
- Civil Engineering - 22.4
Wissensch. Mitarbeiterin / Wissensch. Mitarbeiter Luft-Wasserreinheit
- Pedagogy - 23.4
Assistant professor Television Studies
- Study of Religions - 23.4
Assistant professor of Gender, Ethnicity and Religion (0, 7 fte)
- Arts - 23.4
Universitätsprofessorin / Universitätsprofessor für das Fach Klavier / Klavierduo (BV gem. 99 UG 2002)...
- Business - 16.4
Universitätsassistent/in post doc Non Tenure Track (Assistant Professor, non-tenure-track)
- Medicine - 23.4
Professur für Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhämatologie
- Mathematics - 23.4
Assistant Professorship in Statistics
- Physics - 23.4
WRIPA Project Manager
- Administration - 23.4
Associate Professorship (or Professorship) in Public Policy (Public Administration and Management)
- Medicine - 24.4
Assistant/ Associate/ Full Professor
- Medicine - 24.4
Instructor / Asst Prof / Assoc Prof - OB/Gyn (Generalist)