Our decisions to trust people with our money are based more on how they look then how they behave, according to new research from the University of Warwick.
- Life Sciences - Mar 5 Baby mantises harness mid- air ’spin’ during jumps for precision landings
- Social Sciences - Mar 5 Moderate alcohol consumption increases attractiveness
- Social Sciences - Mar 5 UKIP’s immigration plan is not realistic – but it really doesn’t have to be
- Chemistry - Mar 5 Viticulture journal toasts vineyard protection research
- Environmental Sciences - Mar 5 Shale gas in doubt in UK’s low- carbon transition
- Medicine - Mar 5 Nobel laureate Harold Varmus to join Weill Cornell April 1
- Astronomy - Mar 5 Distant supernova split four ways by gravitational lens
- Life Sciences - Mar 5 Fluid- filled pores separate materials with precision
- Physics - Mar 5 New detector sniffs out origins of methane
- Medicine - Mar 5 £10bn GP incentive scheme has no impact on premature death
- Physics - Mar 5 U.S. and Iran seek nuclear deal despite huge hurdles, a Stanford scholar says
- Life Sciences - Mar 5 'Tip of the iceberg' in concussion treatment
- Environmental Sciences - Mar 5 MIT’s sustainability community gets to work
- Mathematics - Mar 5 Between Micro and Macro, Berkeley Lab Mathematicians Model Fluids at the Mesoscale
- Physics - Mar 5 Study to use ‘peer power’ to address low physical activity rates in teenage girls
- Arts - Mar 5 Gaudier- Brzeska show marks centenary of his death
Looks matter more than reputation when it comes to trusting people with our money
In a paper recently published in the PLoS One journal, researchers from Warwick Business School, the University College London and Dartmouth College, USA, carried out a series of experiments to see if people made decisions to trust others based on their faces.
They found people are more likely to invest money in someone whose face is generally perceived as trustworthy, even when they are given negative information about this person’s reputation.
The team used a computer algorithm to create a set of 20 pairs of faces at opposing ends of the trustworthiness scale. This computer software modifies the apparent trustworthiness of faces by altering their features. The researchers were able to experimentally manipulate the unfakeable features (those related to shape of the face) that make a face look trustworthy or untrustworthy. These 40 faces were then used in a series of trust games with human participants.
Each volunteer was given a sum of money and told they could invest any part of the amount in a trustee whose face appeared on the screen. Any amount they invested would be tripled and volunteers were told it was then up the trustee to decide how much to send back to them. Thus participants had an incentive to invest only in trustees who could be expected to return more than the invested amount.
The researchers found that 13 out of 15 participants invested more, on average, in the trustworthy identities. In a second experiment, the researchers gave the volunteers information about whether the trustees had good or bad histories. Even with this inside information, the average amount invested in those who looked ‘trustworthy’ was 6% higher.
Chris Olivola from the University of Warwick’s Warwick Business School said: “Trustees with good and bad histories benefitted equally from trustworthy-looking facial features. The temptation to judge strangers by their faces is hard to resist. Trustworthiness is one of the most important traits for social and economic interactions and our study examines whether people take potentially costly actions in line with their face-based trustworthiness judgments.
“It seems we are still willing to go with our own instincts about whether we think someone looks like we can trust them.”
Last job offers
- Interdisciplinary - 6.3
Marie Curie Zukunftskolleg Incoming Fellowships (5-year Research Fellowships and 2-year Postdoctoral...
- Life Sciences - 5.3
Doktorandenstelle am Institut für Pathobiochemie
- Administration/Government - 3.3
Wissenschaftliche/r Mitarbeiter/in 80-100%
- Computer Science/Telecom - 2.3
Assistant Professor (Tenure Track) in Information Systems and Data Science
- Business/Economics - 2.3
WissenschaftlicheR MitarbeiterIn am Lehrstuhl für Finance
- Social Sciences - 2.3
Collaborateur ou Collaboratrice scientifique
- Life Sciences - 5.3
Assistant professor in Neuroinflammation
- Business/Economics - 4.3
Professor of Accounting
- Medicine/Pharmacology - 18.2
§ 99 Universitätsprofessur für Gesundheitspsychologie am Institut für Psychologie
- Social Sciences - 4.9
Juniorprofessur für Ethnologie mit Schwerpunkt, Politische Anthropologie (mit tenure track)
- Social Sciences - 5.3
Stiftungsprofessur für Corporate Social Responsibility (W3)
- Veterinary Science - 5.3
Professur Innere Medizin der Kleintiere
- Business/Economics - 5.3
Professor of Economics
- Life Sciences - 5.3
Assistant Professor in Immunology or Immunology and Allergy
- Mechanical Engineering - 5.3
Assistant / Associate/Full Professor of Industrial Engineering
- Civil Engineering - 5.3
Assistant Professor - Educational Organization and Leadership