- Administration - 17:02 Twenty- five names added to University’s First World War roll of honour
- Life Sciences - 13:02 Going to Extremes for Enzymes
- History - 12:04 Anti- Semitism surge in Europe reflects loss of values, historical awareness, says Stanford scholar
- Philosophy - 11:07 Critics pour cold water on the Ice Bucket Challenge: are they right?
- Life Sciences - Aug 28 Flapping baby birds give clues to origin of flight
- Careers - Aug 28 Comment: A stuttering recovery is the smokescreen for an attack on European employment rights
- Medicine - Aug 28 Arthritis patients failing to take expensive medication, according to research
- Life Sciences - Aug 27 A touching story: The ancient conversation between plants, fungi and bacteria
- Social Sciences - Aug 27 Cool Roofs in China Can Save Energy and Reduce Emissions
- Astronomy - Aug 27 Singing astronaut inspects space engineering projects
- Physics - Aug 26 Scientists craft atomically seamless, thinnest- possible semiconductor junctions
- Medicine - Aug 26 Health Digest: Ebola outbreak, HIV persistence, kids’ sleep routines
- Earth Sciences - Aug 26 Stanford geophysicist discusses what weekend’s earthquakes mean for future
- Business - Aug 26 Professor comments on the ills of foregoing vacation days
- Earth Sciences - Aug 26 Comment: What architects can learn from designing with children
- Environmental Sciences - Aug 26 Coal's continued dominance of global industrialization must be made more vivid in climate change accounting
Reduction in U.S. carbon emissions attributed to cheaper natural gas
: Caroline Perry , (617) 496-1351
In 2009, when the United States fell into economic recession, greenhouse gas emissions also fell, by 6.59 percent relative to 2008.
In the power sector, however, the recession was not the main cause.
Researchers at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) have shown that the primary explanation for the reduction in CO2 emissions from power generation that year was that a decrease in the price of natural gas reduced the industry’s reliance on coal.
According to their econometric model, emissions could be cut further by the introduction of a carbon tax, with negligible impact on the price of electricity for consumers.
A regional analysis, assessing the long-term implications for energy investment and policy, appears in the journal Environmental Science and Technology .
In the United States, the power sector is responsible for 40 percent of all carbon emissions. In 2009, CO2 emissions from power generation dropped by 8.76 percent. The researchers attribute that change to the new abundance of cheap natural gas.
"Generating 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity from coal releases twice as much CO2 to the atmosphere as generating the same amount from natural gas, so a slight shift in the relative prices of coal and natural gas can result in a sharp drop in carbon emissions," explains Michael B. McElroy, Gilbert Butler Professor of Environmental Studies at SEAS, who led the study.
"That’s what we saw in 2009," he says, "and we may well see it again."
Patterns of electricity generation, use, and pricing vary widely across the United States. In parts of the Midwest, for instance, almost half of the available power plants (by capacity) were built to process coal. Electricity production can only switch over to natural gas to the extent that gas-fired plants are available to meet the demand. By contrast, the Pacific states and New England barely rely on coal, so price differences there might make less of an impact.
To account for the many variables, McElroy and his colleagues at SEAS developed a model that considers nine regions separately.
Changes in carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector in the nine census regions of the contiguous United States, 2008-2009. Image courtesy of Xi Lu.
Their model identifies the relationship between the cost of electricity generation from coal and gas and the fraction of electricity generated from coal.
"When the natural gas prices are high, as they were 4 years ago, if the gas prices come down a little bit, it doesn’t make any difference," explains lead author Xi Lu, a postdoctoral associate at SEAS. "But there’s a critical price level where the gas systems become more cost-effective than the oldest coal-fired systems.
"If the gas price continues to drop, you’ll continue to go down this curve so that you’ll knock out not just the really ancient coal-fired power plants, but maybe some of the more recent coal-fired plants."
The model also predicts that a government-imposed carbon tax on emissions from power generation would drive a move away from coal.
"With a relatively modest carbon tax--about $5 per ton of CO2--you could save 31 million tons of CO2 in the United States, and that would change the price of electricity by a barely noticeable amount," says McElroy.
The initial model was developed by Jackson Salovaara ’11, an applied mathematics concentrator at SEAS. His work was recognized as the "best senior thesis" in the Harvard Environmental Economics Program, earning him the Stone Prize in May 2011.
Since then, the model has been "souped up," incorporating more sophisticated regional data analysis, and producing not just the findings on 2009 but also predictions for more recent years.
"While the data from 2011 are not yet available, based on the gas prices, we’re making a confident prediction that there should be a continued shift from coal to natural gas in 2011 as compared to 2008," says McElroy.
"That’s good news for the atmosphere."
Last job offers
- Life Sciences - 29.8
Post-doc or research scientist for aerosol chemistry
- Business - 29.8
Wissenschaftliche/r MitarbeiterIn und DoktorandIn in Bank- und Finanzmanagement
- Life Sciences - 29.8
PhD position: Bioinformatic data integration: Assessing microbial biodiversity of agricultural ecosystems...
- Physics - 27.8
Lecturer Sustainable Energy Systems
- Psychology - 25.8
Professor in Counseling Psychology
- Psychology - 25.8
Professeur-e en psychologie du counseling
- Administration - 26.8
Professor II/førsteamanuensis i medisin (pediatri) kombinert med overlegestilling ved OUS
- Administration - 25.8
Professor II/førsteamanuensis kombinert med overlegestilling ved Oslo universitetssykehus
- Physics - 22.8
University Assistant (prae doc)
- Computer Science - 19.8
Professur Signal Processing (m/w)
- Business - 12.6
Professorship in Economics of Energy Markets
- Pedagogy - 28.8
Professur für Didaktik der deutschen Sprache am Germanistischen Institut
- Business - 27.8
Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Finance
- Medicine - 26.8
Departmental Personal Assistant
- Pedagogy - 29.8
Assistant / Associate Professor of French Studies
- Pedagogy - 29.8
Assistant / Associate Professor of Finance