Biodiversity fact check shows the state of biodiversity in Germany for the first time

Investigated habitats in the ’biodiversity fact check’. Photo: FEdA
Investigated habitats in the ’biodiversity fact check’. Photo: FEdA

More than half of the natural habitat types in Germany are in an ecologically unfavorable state, and more valuable habitat areas are disappearing every day. As a result, species populations are shrinking, becoming genetically impoverished or dying out - with a direct impact on the performance and functioning of ecosystems. A third of species are endangered and around three percent are already extinct. The "Biodiversity Fact Check" published today was compiled in collaboration with numerous universities, research institutions and other stakeholders and for the first time provides a comprehensive picture of the actual state of biodiversity in Germany, identifies its trends and drivers, but also makes recommendations to counteract the loss and identifies the need for research.

Hardly any other country conducts as much research into biodiversity as Germany. For the Biodiversity Fact Check (FA), more than 150 scientists from 75 institutions and associations have now evaluated the findings from over 6,000 publications and compiled them in a specially developed database. In order to identify long-term developments, they have created and analyzed an unprecedented data set of around 15,000 trends from almost 6,200 time series. "The Biodiversity Fact Check is one of the first examples worldwide of how large international reports - such as the global and regional assessments of the World Biodiversity Council IPBES - can be tailored to a national context with the aim of identifying and developing options for action for specific national and subnational policies," explains Christian Wirth, Professor at the University of Leipzig and co-editor of the FA.

The results are sobering. Overall, 60 percent of the 93 habitat types examined are in an inadequate or poor condition. Formerly species-rich arable land and grassland, moors, bog woodlands, swamps and springs are in the worst condition. The FA has identified only a few positive developments, for example in deciduous forests - but these are acutely threatened by climate change.

10,000 species in Germany are endangered

Of the 72,000 known animal, plant and fungal species native to Germany, only 40 percent have so far been examined to determine whether their populations are endangered. Of these species, almost a third are endangered. The threat is increasing for agricultural and open land species and others, especially in species-rich groups such as insects, molluscs and plants. The time series show that the trends in habitats and populations are now also reflected in the biodiversity of biotic communities. Near-natural communities are beginning to become impoverished in terms of species. At the same time, we are seeing an accelerated shift towards novel communities with an increasing proportion of alien species," says Jori Maylin Marx, scientist at Leipzig University and co-editor of the FA.

There is particularly little data on soil biodiversity and species diversity in the constantly growing urban areas. "Where the data basis is available, we find another problem: there is no uniform, cross-species and cross-habitat system for recording biodiversity. This makes it difficult to link data - and thus to carry out scientific analysis. There is also a lack of long-term documentation. The majority of the time series we analyzed were too short to produce statistically significant trends," explains Helge Bruelheide, professor at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg and co-editor of the FA. Due to the inadequate data basis, the exact causes of biodiversity loss are also insufficiently known. This is mainly due to the fact that the influences caused by us humans have so far either not been recorded at all or only incompletely and in most cases independently of the recording of biodiversity," adds Josef Settele, Head of the Department of Nature Conservation Research at the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ) and co-editor of the FA.

Stopping the loss of biodiversity with targeted measures

There is clear evidence that the loss of habitats and the intensification of the use of cultivated landscapes have the strongest negative effect on biodiversity, and the first effects of climate change are also becoming visible. The intensification of agriculture has negative effects in almost all habitats, not only in agricultural and open land, and therefore offers the greatest leverage for biodiversity conservation approaches. The FA also shows positive developments in some species groups and habitats, for example by improving the water quality of our rivers and promoting natural structural elements in forests and agricultural landscapes. "This shows that we can stop the loss of biodiversity with targeted measures," explains Nina Farwig, Professor at Philipps University Marburg and FA co-editor. "For a real turnaround, we need to restore nature to a greater extent. Above all, however, we must learn to manage with nature - not against it. This can also mean accounting for environmental costs in economic reports. Above all, new biodiversity-based land use systems must be developed. Modern technologies can help here."

Legal and funding policy instruments of nature conservation policy are insufficiently implemented or enforced, often due to a lack of coordination with other usage interests, criticize the researchers in the FA. Funding is often linked to the mere implementation of biodiversity-promoting measures, whereas success-based financial incentives promise a greater positive impact. Biodiversity protection could also be made more binding if it were linked to higher-ranking rights, for example in the form of a human right to a healthy environment or a constitutionally guaranteed right of nature. The FA provides recommendations for the far-reaching rethinking required for this, as the scientists have analyzed successful projects in order to understand the conditions for transformation. They identify a variety of motivations and actors, successful participation and economic benefits as decisive factors for successful approaches.

Biological diversity pays off

Biologically diverse ecosystems are more efficient and more stable. They provide people with food and raw materials, maintain nutrient cycles, protect the climate and keep water in the landscape. The preservation of biodiversity ensures our well-being, but also economic activity. If we protect biodiversity, we protect ourselves," explains Volker Mosbrugger, spokesperson for the Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), in which the Federal Ministry of Education and Research has funded the Biodiversity Fact Check. "The Biodiversity Fact Check is a highly impressive reference and reference work that provides the scientific basis for taking practical, effective measures to conserve biodiversity in Germany."

The scientific report "Faktencheck Artenvielfalt. Stocktaking and perspectives for the conservation of biodiversity in Germany" is published today (October 1, 2024) by oekom-Verlag and is available online for free download. It is accompanied by a summary for social decision-making.


Biodiversity fact check: Inventory and perspectives for the conservation of biodiversity in Germany

Christian Wirth, Helge Bruelheide, Nina Farwig, Jori Maylin Marx, Josef Settele (ed.)
oekom-Verlag, 2024
ISBN: 978-3-98726’095 -7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/978­3987263361

Biodiversity fact check: Inventory and perspectives for the conservation of biodiversity in Germany. Summary for societal decision-making
Christian Wirth, Helge Bruelheide, Nina Farwig, Jori Maylin Marx, Josef Settele (ed.)
oekom-Verlag, 2024
ISBN: 978-3-98726’096 -4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/978­3987263378


In the Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) funds scientific projects to analyze biodiversity in Germany and to develop and implement innovative, effective measures to protect and improve biodiversity. The FEdA currently includes 39 projects. In the spirit of "transformative" science, the initiative supports the targeted exchange between research, politics, business, agriculture and forestry, nature conservation and civil society.