Managing rail disruptions more effectively

On Switzerland’s busy rail network, even minor glitches can cause chaos to

On Switzerland’s busy rail network, even minor glitches can cause chaos to timetables. (Photo: SBB CFF FFS)

Commuters know only too well: the congested rail network is causing more and more incidents and delays. ETH doctoral candidate Steffen Schranil has developed a method that allows the duration of disruptions to be predicted early and reliably.

Last year, the trains of Swiss Federal Railways (SBB) were frequently late. Dense timetables and heavily used routes leave little leeway. As a result, even minor malfunctions or construction sites can throw the schedule out of sync - with negative consequences for the customer. "It is almost impossible to avoid rail disruptions completely, but they can be managed more effectively," says Steffen Schranil, traffic engineer and, until recently, a doctoral candidate at ETH Zurich’s Institute for Transport Planning and Systems. In his dissertation, Schranil tackled the issue of whether and how rail disruptions can be determined early and reliably - reliably enough to be able to draw conclusions about the expected duration of the disruption.

Predictable rail operations

Most rail disruptions are recurring events with a limited impact and duration, such as jammed doors or damaged tracks. More serious and longer incidents such as derailments are fairly rare in comparison. "This is not just a fundamental requirement for stable rail operations - it also allows us to manage rail disruptions more effectively," explains the traffic engineer. In theory, this also makes it possible to predict disruptions.

Schranil’s method is based on a statistical analysis of previous incidents and the processes used to resolve them. The data was provided by SBB, Deutsche Bahn and a number of urban rail operators. Before being able to compare disruptions in the different rail systems, the researcher had to clarify the terminology. There are basically two types of disruptions: technical and operational disruptions. Examples of technical disruptions include broken air conditioning systems, faulty traction units and the notorious signal box malfunctions. These can affect the timetable and lead to delayed trains or missed connections: such deviations from the timetable are called operational disruptions. However, operational disruptions can also occur without technical causes, such as when a group of passengers is blocking a train that is ready to depart.

Precise predictions

On the basis of these two definitions, Schranil categorised numerous technical and operational disruptions according to their type and duration and looked for statistical patterns. He also analysed the time-related consequences of different disruptions, including the measures and processes that were needed to resolve the incidents. His aim: to calculate the probability of each event exceeding or falling below a certain duration. This has made it possible to draw conclusions such as: 80 percent of all traction unit malfunctions last for a maximum of 15 minutes. Specific information about a major disruption - such as the cause or the exact location - is also taken into account in the prediction process in order to increase the level of accuracy. This allows the duration of technical disruptions as well as the time-related consequences for rail operations to be predicted even more precisely.

Michael Keller

This site uses cookies and analysis tools to improve the usability of the site. More information. |