Why was Donald Trump sniffling?



In the first US presidential debate there were many who noticed Donald Trump’s sniffling. It created a twitter storm under the hashtag #TrumpSniffles and the media became extremely interested in the presidential candidate’s health. However, Lisa Flower, a doctoral student in Sociology at Lund University, Sweden, who is currently doing research on emotions, offers an alternative explanation:

‘My research shows that sniffling can be a way for a speaker to indicate a shift from personal to professional opinions and vice versa. I have called this ’the emotional sniff? as personal statements are allowed to be more emotional. This emotional sniffling is also used when making statements that may be deemed inappropriate for a professional role’, says Lisa Flower.

In the scientific article ’The (Un)emotional Law Student? Lisa Flower discusses the concept of ’the emotional sniff’. Her research is based on observations and’s with law students who, in their role as future lawyers, must learn various strategies for dealing with personal feelings. According to Lisa Flower’s observations, sniffling was an unconscious way for law students to indicate the shift between personal and professional statements.

So, in Donald Trump’s case, how would you interpret the sniffling?
‘I noted that Trump sniffled more often when questions about Mexico and Mexican immigration came up. One might interpret these questions as more personal to him’, says Lisa Flower.

Lisa Flower’s article - The (Un)emotional Law Student - is the second-most ed article from Lund University this year, and was ed nearly 700 times during the days that followed the presidential debate.

Box 117, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
Telephone +46 (0)46 222 0000 (switchboard)
Fax +46 (0)46 222 4720

Invoice address: Box 188, 221 00 Lund
Organisation number: 202100-3211
About this website

This site uses cookies and analysis tools to improve the usability of the site. More information. |