World scientists declare climate emergency

A paper published in BioScience has outlined six steps humanity needs to take to reduce the impact of the emerging climate crisis. Dr Thomas Newsome, a co-author of the paper, says scientists have a moral obligation to warn of any great threat.

A global team of scientists including Dr Thomas Newsome at the University of Sydney and international colleagues has warned that "untold human suffering" is unavoidable without deep and lasting shifts in human activities that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and other factors related to climate change.

The declaration is based on scientific analysis of more than 40 years of publicly available data covering a broad range of measures, including energy use, surface temperature, population growth, land clearing, deforestation, polar ice mass, fertility rates, gross domestic product and carbon emissions.

"Scientists have a moral obligation to warn humanity of any great threat," said Dr Newsome from the School of Life and Environment Sciences. "From the data we have, it is clear we are facing a climate emergency."

In a paper published today in  BioScience , the authors from the University of Sydney, Oregon State University, University of Cape Town and Tufts University, along with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from 153 countries, declare a climate emergency, present data showing trends as benchmarks against which to measure progress and outline six areas of action to mitigate the worst effects of a human-induced climate change.

"Despite 40 years of major global negotiations, we have generally conducted business as usual and are essentially failing to address this crisis," said  Professor William Ripple , distinguished professor of ecology in the Oregon State University College of Forestry and co-lead author of the paper. "Climate change has arrived and is accelerating faster than many scientists expected."

Dr Newsome said that measuring global surface temperatures will continue to remain important. However, he said that a "broader set of indicators should be monitored, including human population growth, meat consumption, tree-cover loss, energy consumption, fossil-fuel subsidies and annual economic losses to extreme weather events".

He said the indicators are intended to be useful for the public, policymakers and the business community to track progress over time.

"While things are bad, all is not hopeless. We can take steps to address the climate emergency," Dr Newsome said.

Six steps for the planet

The scientists point to six areas in which humanity should take immediate steps to slow down the effects of a warming planet:

  • Energy. Implement massive conservation practices; replace fossil fuels with clean renewables; leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground; eliminate subsidies to fossil fuel companies; and impose carbon fees that are high enough to restrain the use of fossil fuels.
  • Short -lived pollutants.  Swiftly cut emissions of methane, hydrofluorocarbons, soot and other short-lived climate pollutants. This has the potential to reduce the short-term warming trend by more than 50 percent over the next few decades.
  • Nature. Restrain massive land clearing. Restore and protect ecosystems such as forests, grasslands and mangroves, which would greatly contribute to the sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide, a key greenhouse gas.
  • Food.  Eat mostly plants and consume fewer animal products. This dietary shift would significantly reduce emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases and free up agricultural lands for growing human food rather than livestock feed. Reducing food waste is also critical - the scientists say at least one-third of all food produced ends up as garbage.
  • Economy.  Convert the economy’s reliance on carbon fuels to address human dependence on the biosphere. Shift goals away from the growth of gross domestic product and the pursuit of affluence. Curtail the extraction of materials and exploitation of ecosystems to maintain long-term biosphere sustainability.
  • Population. Stabilise global population, which is increasing by more than 200,000 people a day, using approaches that ensure social and economic justice.
  • The paper states: "Mitigating and adapting to climate change means transforming the ways we govern, manage, eat, and fulfil material and energy requirements.

    "We are encouraged by a recent global surge of concern - governments adopting new policies; schoolchildren striking; lawsuits proceeding; and grassroots citizen movements demanding change.

    "As scientists, we urge widespread use of the vital signs and hope the graphical indicators will better allow policymakers and the public to understand the magnitude of the crisis, realign priorities and track progress."

    The graphs illustrate how climate-change indicators and factors have changed over the past 40 years, since scientists from 50 nations met at the First World Climate Conference in Geneva in 1979.

    In the ensuing decades, multiple other global assemblies have agreed that urgent action is necessary, but greenhouse gas emissions are still rapidly rising. Other ominous signs from human activities include sustained increases in per-capita meat production, global tree cover loss and number of airline passengers.

    There are also some encouraging signs - including decreases in global birth rates and decelerated forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon and increases in wind and solar power - but even those are tinged with worry.

    The decline in birth rates has slowed over the last 20 years, for example, and the pace of Amazon forest loss may be starting to increase again.

    "Global surface temperature, ocean heat content, extreme weather and its costs, sea level, ocean acidity and land area are all rising," Professor Ripple said.

    "Ice is rapidly disappearing as shown by declining trends in minimum summer Arctic sea ice, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and glacier thickness. All of these rapid changes highlight the urgent need for action."

    Joining Dr Newsome and Professor Ripple are co-lead author  Dr Christopher Wolf , a postdoctoral scholar in the Oregon State University College of Forestry;  Dr Phoebe Barnard  of the Biological Conservation Institute and the University of Cape Town; and  Emeritus Professor William Moomaw  of Tufts University.

    Declaration

    The  Worthy Garden Club  provided partial funding for this project.


    This site uses cookies and analysis tools to improve the usability of the site. More information. |