The odds that a 22-year absence of mass shootings in Australia since 1996 gun reforms are due to chance are one in 200,000, new research reveals.
Published today in the Annals of Internal Medicine , scholars at the University of Sydney and Macquarie University used mathematical techniques to test the null hypothesis that the rate of mass shootings in Australia before and after the 1996 law reforms is unchanged.
The National Firearms Agreement , enacted after the Port Arthur massacre in Tasmania in which 35 died and another 23 were seriously injured, saw the destruction of more than a million firearms--perhaps a third of the country’s private gun stock.
Most people hear these starkly contrasting numbers and conclude that Australia’s gun law reforms effectively stopped firearm massacres here.
The Agreement included uniform gun registration, repudiation of self-defence as a legitimate reason to hold a firearm licence, mandatory locked storage, a ban on mail order sales and standardised penalties, and the banning of semi-automatic rifles and pump action shot guns from civilian ownership.
Its provisions were subsequently enacted in national, state and territory legislation across Australia.
In the 18 years up to and including the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, there were 13-gun homicides in which five or more people died, not including the perpetrator. In the 22 years since, there have been no such incidents.
"Most people hear these starkly contrasting numbers and conclude that Australia’s gun law reforms effectively stopped firearm massacres here," says the paper’s lead author, Emeritus Professor Simon Chapman of the University of Sydney.
"However, some scholars and members of the gun lobby have argued that since mass shootings are relatively rare events, the concentration of incidents in one decade and their absence in another decade is merely a statistical anomaly."
For example, Australian researcher Dr Samara McPhedran writing in The Conversation said: "Mass shootings are rare events, and the long gap between incidents post-1996 may simply reflect a return to a more ’normal’ state of affairs, similar to the years before 1987."
Australia followed standard public health procedures to reduce the risk of multiple shooting events, and we can see the evidence. It worked.
"This was no accident," says the new study’s co-author Associate Professor Philip Alpers, from the University of Sydney.
"Australia followed standard public health procedures to reduce the risk of multiple shooting events, and we can see the evidence. It worked.
"Gun lobby-affiliated and other researchers have been saying for years that mass shootings are such rare events it could have been a matter of luck they dropped off in the wake of Australia’s gun control laws," says Alpers. "Instead, we found the odds against this hypothesis are 200,000 to one."
In related news, Tasmania’s re-elected Premier has defended the Liberals’ policy to relax the state’s gun laws, despite an outcry from survivors of the Port Arthur shooting.
Since major gun law reform 20 years ago, Australia has seen no mass shootings and an accelerating decline in intentional firearm deaths, the Journal of the American Medical Association reports today.
By accepting the common mantra that law-abiding, licensed firearm owners areánot the problem, many have chased popular fears such asámental illnessáandáviolent video games.
No Australian State or Territory has ever complied fully with the 1996 or 2002 firearms resolutions collectively formed under the National Firearms Agreement, a new report reveals today.