- Sport Sciences - Oct 11 Unexpected insight
- Business - Sep 29 U-M launches exercise and sport science initiative
- Sport Sciences - Sep 22 Greener grass for athletes as world- class synthetic fields open at UQ
- Life Sciences - Sep 15 Paralympic medal glory for Imperial’s Dave Henson
- Sport Sciences - Sep 15 Statement from Stanford athletics director on NCAA violations
- Life Sciences - Sep 15 Soccer and Science, a Winning Formula for Teammates
- Sport Sciences - Sep 13 ’The Game Changer’ documentary on accessibility pioneer Tim Nugent premieres Sept. 22 on BTN
- Computer Science - Aug 19 Analysis program contributes to Olympic victory
- Sport Sciences - Aug 19 Downs as well as the ups of a football club’s fortunes build fans’ loyalty
- Sport Sciences - Aug 12 Aesthetics over athletics when it comes to women in sport
- Sport Sciences - Aug 5 How well do you know your supplement?
- Sport Sciences - Aug 4 Q&A on the Olympics with Andrei Markovits: Why Rio needs the Olympics now more than ever
- Sport Sciences - Jul 28 England’s 1966 World Cup victory – giving female fans a voice
- Sport Sciences - Jul 5 What happens when sports rules go awry?
- Physics - Jul 4 Science could help search for the next Andy Murray
- Sport Sciences - Jun 13 The perfect football boot
Survey identifies football fans´ view of cheating
Faking injury and diving in the penalty area have been identified as the forms of cheating on the football pitch that are most disliked by fans, according to a new study by academics at the University of Sheffield.
The study, which has surveyed over 500 supporters of those nations competing in the forthcoming World Cup, has also found that Argentina and Italy are considered by fans to be the worst culprits for cheating in the international game.The survey, devised by academics in the University´s Institute of Work Psychology, investigates fans´ commitment to football, their attitudes towards a number of different types of behaviour often considered as gamesmanship, and whether they would disapprove of these actions by players from their team or from the opposition. It also asked respondents which nation they considered their country´s biggest rivals on the pitch.
Just under 80% of respondents disapproved of pretending to have been assaulted by an opposition player. This was closely followed by footballers diving in an attempt to win a penalty (75%), hand ball to score a goal (74%) and exaggerating an injury received in a tackle (70%). However, perceptions varied by nationality, with Italian and Spanish respondents the least likely to consider diving in the penalty area as cheating.Unsurprisingly the findings suggested that fans look more favourably on certain behaviours when performed by their own team rather than the opposition, particularly `professional fouls´ or handball to stop a goal being conceded. Results also indicated that behaviours such as time-wasting, and arguing with the referee to influence his decision, were least likely to be considered as cheating.
Over 75% of respondents believed certain countries were more likely to cheat than others. Among these fans, Italy were rated as the team most likely to contain cheating players, followed by Argentina. Local rivalry and past conflict played a part in such views, with many supporters selecting a neighbouring country or historic sporting rival as the team most likely to contain cheating players. A notable exception to this pattern were England fans, with almost 60% naming Germany as the team they would most like to beat, but very few (1%) considering them as the team most likely to cheat. Likewise, Australian fans would typically most like to see their team beat England, but none believed England were the team most likely to cheat.The survey is part of a wider study, which will record instances of cheating throughout the forthcoming World Cup and determine the extent to which the tendency to cheat is a result of personal attitudes, team traits or a consequence of a specific match situation. It will also look at whether any variation in cheating by country corresponds with the findings from the fan survey, and which characteristics of players, teams or match situations most strongly affect the amount of cheating that occurs.
Dr Chris Stride, from the University´s Institute of Work Psychology, said: "The way in which fans´ disapproval of cheating varies according to the perpetrator and the offence is fascinating, and we look forward to seeing if supporters´ moral judgment and prejudice are shared by their nation´s players, and borne out during the tournament."
Last job offers
- Business/Economics - 21.10
Full Professor of International Macroeconomics (1.0 FTE)
- Computer Science/Telecom - 21.10
Tenure Track Position as Associate Senior Lecturer in Signal Processing
- Business/Economics - 31.8
Professur für Finanzwirtschaft
- Administration/Government - 31.8
Six (6) ZIF Marie Curie 5-year Research Fellowships, and, four (4) Zukunftskolleg Research Fellowships,...
- Education/Continuing Education - 6.10
Teamleiter/in im Referat 64 - Personalservice’ Professuren’ Beamten- und Ausbildungsverhältnisse...
- Administration/Government - 23.9
Research fellow with 1/2 part-time employment - E 13 TV-L HU (third party funding’ short-term until...
- Medicine/Pharmacology - 21.10
Research Associate (FinCH Study) 0.5 FTE
- Literature/Linguistics - 19.10
Senior Research Associate