NASA-style caution needed before allowing research to influence policy

Nine-stage Nasa technology readiness levels should be applied to behavioural sci

Nine-stage Nasa technology readiness levels should be applied to behavioural science before findings are applied to the public, according to a new paper published in Nature Human Behaviour Published 12 Oct 2020 Share This Tweet Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Home News NASA-style caution needed before allowing research to influence policy NASA-style caution needed before allowing research to influence policy social sciences Nature Behavioural science should undergo rigorous testing and review before it informs public policy such as government responses to COVID-19, according to a paper in Nature Human Behaviour :  Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy.   Andrew K. Przybyls ki, director of research at  Oxford’s Internet Institute , is joint lead author of the paper, which recommends NASA’s Technology Readiness levels be used to ensure new ideas are adequately tested before being adopted by governments and politicians. The NASA system envisages a nine-stage process, beginning with ’basic principles’ going through to ’successful mission operations’, to ensure safety and efficacy. Such an approach to behavioural science, could have a significant effect on how governments decide advice on household mixing or whether to encourage the use of public transport during a pandemic. Przybylski, says, It’s positive to see that researchers across the social sciences are turning their attention to developing solutions to help governments deal with coronavirus. However, we all need to ensure policy interventions informed by behavioural science are rigorously tested before being used on real-life people in real-life situations The paper argues social and behavioural science research methods can make it difficult to know if policies will do more good than harm and argues for caution in the way research is communicated during crises.  The team also calls for greater diversity and expertise of researchers, and experts in philosophy, ethics, statistics, and data and code management to work together to produce internationally-relevant research.

Behavioural science should undergo rigorous testing and review before it informs public policy such as government responses to COVID-19, according to a paper in Nature Human Behaviour Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy .

Professor  Andrew K. Przybyls ki, director of research at  Oxford’s Internet Institute , is joint lead author of the paper, which recommends NASA’s Technology Readiness levels be used to ensure new ideas are adequately tested before being adopted by governments and politicians.

The NASA system envisages a nine-stage process, beginning with ’basic principles’ going through to ’successful mission operations’, to ensure safety and efficacy. Such an approach to behavioural science, could have a significant effect on how governments decide advice on household mixing or whether to encourage the use of public transport during a pandemic.

Professor Przybylski, says, It’s positive to see that researchers across the social sciences are turning their attention to developing solutions to help governments deal with coronavirus. However, we all need to ensure policy interventions informed by behavioural science are rigorously tested before being used on real-life people in real-life situations

The paper argues social and behavioural science research methods can make it difficult to know if policies will do more good than harm and argues for caution in the way research is communicated during crises.  The team also calls for greater diversity and expertise of researchers, and experts in philosophy, ethics, statistics, and data and code management to work together to produce internationally-relevant research.


This site uses cookies and analysis tools to improve the usability of the site. More information. |