Emma Connolly (UCL Digital Speech Lab) explores the issues, from fears about technology to threats to democracy, that voters on both sides of the political divide agree in The Conversation.
During his recent public spat with Donald Trump, Elon Musk tweeted a poll asking if a new political party would better represent the 80% of voters in the middle. Hundreds of thousands of people responded and more than 80% answered "yes" .
The middle is still overlooked in US politics. This is because there is a perception that Republicans and Democrats have nothing in common, and therefore no issue will win support from both centrist Republicans and Democrats.
Polarisation is problematic as it is linked to "democratic backsliding" - the use of underhand tactics in political processes. Worst of all, it poses a threat to democracy.
Many think that polarisation is fuelled by echo chambers created on social media platforms. These only expose people to beliefs similar to their own.
However, I study how narratives , and ways to investigate them. My work has two aims: first, to identify political issues that are likely to cross party lines, and a wider goal of exploring the role of social media in mitigating, rather than exacerbating, levels of polarisation.
Earlier this year, for example, I sorted through 12,000 posts from Republican and Democrat voters on subreddits (online forums discussing specific topics). Using a technique I developed in my PhD research , I analysed attitudes to contested political issues around the time of Trump’s inauguration. Like other researchers , I am finding that there are things both sides often agree on, and that not every issue splits neatly across party lines.
Although it’s a complex topic, people from both parties are worried about levels of free speech on social media. According to my work and , some Democrats accuse TikTok of censoring hashtags such as #FreeLuigi (a reference to Luigi Mangione, accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO, Brian Thompson).
Meanwhile, some Republicans are saying they are flooded with what they see as left-wing content pushed by the algorithms. Despite their differences, Republicans and Democrats agree that social media platforms need to be more transparent about the way they work.
Both sides worry about the rise of authoritarianism and the growing negative influence of artificial intelligence in shaping the US’s future. There is a sense among some members of the two parties that the real enemies aren’t each other, but powerful corporations who hold too much power.
People on both sides of the political divide can be distrustful of tech companies and big businesses, where billionaires have power regardless of who’s in charge. Divisions of "up v down" could be alternatives to seeing divisions as "left v right".
Some people are worried about the creation of a massive database of citizens’ details, and how their details could be used, or abused. Recently Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene said she would have opposed Trump’s "big, beautiful, bill", had she read the AI clause thoroughly. The clause stops states from passing laws to regulate AI systems for the next ten years.
What do people agree on?
On the topic of protecting democracy, there are some suggestions that many Republicans and Democrats agree this is important , and under threat. In my study, some Republican and Democrat voters object to the possibility of Trump having a third term , aligning with the findings of several recent polls on the subject, and even among Trump’s most loyal support groups.
Both Republicans and Democrats want "the best" leaders who could get things done fast and efficiently. But it would appear that people on both sides are concerned about the "slash-and-burn" way that Doge (the Department for Government Efficiency, the new agency tasked with cutting federal spending) is working.
Also, deciding who is the best leader isn’t always about agreeing with specific policies. Instead, it’s about delivering decisive, efficient action. Even Republicans who don’t back everything Trump is doing say that at least he is doing something, especially in relation to immigration.
Many Republicans criticise the left, and former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris in particular, but for unclear messaging , as much as any one policy. They (and others) put her loss down to a lack of direction and clarity on key issues (among other things). This probably resulted in failing to win votes from independents and moderate Republicans and many Democrats are frustrated that the party still hasn’t addressed this.
Research suggests that Democrat and Republican voters often agree that polarisation causes gridlock and prevents progress , but believe voices from the middle are not being heard. Some Republicans and Democrats also share a concern that both parties are more focused on fighting each other than on solving problems , with 86% of Americans believing this.
Some Republican voters in the posts I am analysing suggest that working together to get things done would be positive, supporting findings from the US and abroad. Other important factors rather than political party, such as religion or family or everyday life experiences can bring people from both sides together.
So, Americans might not be as divided as one might think. Levels of polarisation feel high but this could be skewed by the extreme views of a minority on both sides. And it isn’t helped by some sensationalist media reporting.
Lots of people get their news from social media platforms which reward and monetise engagement. Posts that fuel division are often the most visible , but they rarely tell the whole story. Divisive views are also often shared by those who are themselves the most polarised.
Like Musk’s online poll, research is starting to suggest that there is still a sizeable moderate middle in the US today who are open to compromise through clear messaging. These voters can make all the difference , especially if parties can frame issues in ways that appeal across the divide. With the 2026 midterm elections on the horizon , both sides might want to listen to them more.
- University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT (0) 20 7679 2000