Dr Man Zhang. Photo: FGZ
Dr Man Zhang. Photo: FGZ -In theory, there are some pragmatic reasons for the Chinese government to act as a mediator - The war against Ukraine continues, China's position remains unclear even after President Xi's visit to Moscow. Dr Man Zhang from the Research Centre Global Dynamics (ReCentGlobe) at Leipzig University talks about possible motivations of the Chinese government, especially with regard to a mediating role between Russia and Ukraine. -However, judging from Chinese politics in recent years, whether the priority of economic development is still given by Beijing compared to its political agenda has become increasingly vague-, she says. Man Zhang's research focuses on politics, society and justice in China. How do you assess President Xi's recent trip to Moscow with regard to the war against Ukraine? There are two possible explanations for Xi-s visit to Russia regarding the Russia-Ukraine war: one is that the Chinese government, as it officially has claimed in the Joint Statement, discussed the possibility of peace talks to end the war and achieve international stability. If this is true, it is likely that the Chinese government would act as an active mediator in the peace talks. The other interpretation is that Xi-s visit to Russia is a clear signal that Beijing is -taking a side,- although the Chinese government has repeatedly denied this. The motivation for such an act could be related to China's relationship with Taiwan (and furthermore, tensions with the United States). The Xi government may take action against Taiwan, most likely by force. Siding with Russia also seeks allies for its actions. China has presented a "peace plan" - how realistic is it that China will play a role as a mediator?
TO READ THIS ARTICLE, CREATE YOUR ACCOUNT
And extend your reading, free of charge and with no commitment.
