Athletes ’future guilt’ can be used to dissuade them from taking performance enhancing substances.
Athletes 'future guilt' can be used to dissuade them from taking performance enhancing substances. Appealing to athletes' sense of 'future guilt' through psychological intervention could prove a powerful weapon in the fight against doping, according to a new study. Researchers discovered that making elite athletes picture how guilty they might feel about using banned performance enhancing drugs produced a more powerful initial reaction than initiatives educating sportspeople about the health risks of doping. Working with 208 athletes across the UK and Greece, researchers carried out two six-month trials - one a psychological intervention focussing on emotions and personal choice, the other an education programme highlighting the risks and health consequences of doping. Using real athlete stories and testimonies on video, they made participants aware of emotions experienced by sportspeople who had doped, contrasting those feelings with emotions experienced by successful athletes who competed clean. Participants discussed the athletes' stories - enhancing their understanding of the emotions linked to doping. Researchers explored the justifications athletes use for doping (moral disengagement) and drew attention to the consequences doping has for others - whether family, friends, teammates or other competitors.
TO READ THIS ARTICLE, CREATE YOUR ACCOUNT
And extend your reading, free of charge and with no commitment.