How organisms develop from inanimate matter is one of the biggest questions in science. Although many possible explanations have been proposed, there are no definitive answers. That’s no surprise: these processes took place three to four billion years ago, when the conditions on Earth were completely different from today.
Justifying hypotheses with experimental data"Over this vast period of time, evolution has thoroughly obliterated the traces that lead back to the origins of life," says Roland Riek, Professor of Physical Chemistry and Associate Director of ETH Zurich’s new interdisciplinary Centre for Origin and Prevalence of Life. Science has no choice but to formulate hypotheses - and to substantiate them as thoroughly as possible with experimental data.
For years, Riek and his team have been pursuing the idea that protein-like aggregates, known as amyloids, might have played an important role in the transition between chemistry and biology. Riek’s research group’s first step was to demonstrate that such amyloids can be formed relatively easily under the conditions that probably prevailed on the early Earth: in the laboratory, all it takes is a little volcanic gas (as well as experimental skill and a lot of patience) for simple amino acids to combine into short peptide chains, which then spontaneously assemble into fibres (see ).
Precursor molecules of lifeLater, Riek’s team demonstrated that amyloids can replicate themselves (see ) - which means that the molecules fulfil another decisive criterion for being considered precursor molecules of life. And now the researchers have taken the same line for a third time with their latest study, in which they show that amyloids are able to bind with molecules of both RNA and DNA.
These interactions are partly based on electrostatic attraction, since some amyloids are - at least in places - positively charged, while the genetic material carries a negative charge, at least in a neutral to acidic environment. However, Riek and his team have also noticed that the interactions also depend on the sequence of the RNA and DNA nucleotides in the genetic material. This means they might represent a kind of precursor to the universal genetic code that unites all living beings.
Increased stability as a major advantageAnd yet: "Although we see differences in how the RNA and DNA molecules bind with the amyloids, we don’t yet understand what these differences mean," Riek says. "Our model is probably still too simple." That’s why he sees another aspect of the results as particularly important: when the genetic material attaches itself to amyloids, both molecules gain stability. In ancient times, this increased stability may have proved to be a great advantage.
This is because back then, in the so-called primordial soup, biochemical molecules were very dilute. Contrast this with today’s biological cells, within which these molecules are tightly packed together. "Amyloids have the proven potential to increase the local concentration and order of nucleotides in an otherwise dilute disordered system," write Riek’s researchers in their recently published article.
Riek points out that although competition is central to Darwin’s theory of evolution, cooperation has also played a major evolutionary role. Both classes of molecules benefit from the stabilising interaction between amyloids and RNA or DNA molecules because long-lived molecules accumulate more strongly over time than unstable substances. It may even be that molecular cooperation, rather than competition, was the decisive factor in the emergence of life. "After all, there was likely no shortage of space or resources back then," Riek says.